How to Write a College Review Application Essay

How to Write a College Review Application EssayYou may be wondering how to write a college review application essay. What would you expect to find in one of these? Read on to find out.Students are very particular about the final document, they submit to colleges, universities and high schools. This is so because many think that one of the primary purposes of submitting an application to get into college is to get into an excellent college or university. This is one goal.What students need to know, though, is that college review essays are not all about what you think about the college you are going to attend. They also need to know that it is about how well you apply to the college or university you are interested in. Knowing how to write a college review essay helps both students and parents in making this determination.The first thing you should look for when writing a college review essay is to include your personal statement (PS) as a part of the essay. The PS is your chance to e xpress yourself about yourself and why you want to attend that particular college or university. It does not have to be lengthy, but it should be realistic and specific. In addition, you should state your personal goals as well as those of your family.When looking at how to write a college review application essay, you also need to know about using current events to support your narrative. Most importantly, do not repeat something that has already been said in a previous paragraph. For example, if the last paragraph talked about what was going on in the student's life at the time the essay was written, make sure that you state something new and specific in the next paragraph.Many writers think that they know how to write a college review application because they have taken classes and reviewed previous essays in the past. In reality, that is not the way to go. Writing a college review requires that you use your own experiences and make a statement about yourself based on what has ha ppened in your life so far.Another important aspect to how to write a college review application is that you take into consideration the fact that the College Board is a big business. The College Board wants to see their students get into good colleges and universities and thus, they will often give the college you attended, no matter how good, a low grade. Do not go into the College Board's office with a case that you just feel should give a higher grade than another college. Ask questions about how the process works, for example, what would you like to see changed.Having read this, you now know how to write a college review application. The last piece of the puzzle is to talk to a college counselor who can help you with what to write in your essay.

What Gun Control Topics For Research Paper Are Right and Wrong?

What Gun Control Topics For Research Paper Are Right and Wrong?Not too long ago, when writing an essay on a gun control topic for research paper, the writer really did not have any specific ideas as to what would be right or wrong. In fact, most professors either opposed it or approved of it.The same may be true of your essay on a gun control topic for research paper, unless you are armed with a good idea of the controversy surrounding the issue. If you do not know much about guns, its history, the laws, or anything else related to it, it may be difficult to make a great essay. So you need to put your research to good use.A good thing to do is first put together a summary of the gun control topics for research paper that you wish to cover in your essay. Find a topic that will provide an overview of what gun control is and how it should be enforced. Then, simply fill in the blanks from that outline and write out your entire essay.One thing that you may want to keep in mind when writin g a research paper on gun control is to avoid making a direct statement about gun control. Yes, that is an appropriate place to state a strong opinion on the matter, but do not claim that you or your views on gun control are universal. You may believe it should be left up to the states to make their own decisions, but don't say something as a researcher that you would not say on your college campus. Save that stuff for the debate of what is an appropriate amount of gun control and in what circumstances it should be allowed.In addition, never make a reference to any person or group of people in a way that makes them look bad, for example, putting down the National Rifle Association as some sort of evil organization. Also, if you are referring to a group of people as 'the good guys,' try to keep in mind that some of them arenot very nice people. Also, do not include suggestions of violence in your writing. This is not the place for that.You can easily summarize the issues on gun contr ol in an essay in several different ways. For example, you could start by discussing the legal rights of people, then moving onto the legal responsibilities that they have when they violate those rights, then ending with a few generalizations about gun ownership in general.Some other places to use as background material for your essay are your cultural background, your family background, and your current situation in life. If you have been a criminal, have been in a jail or prison, etc., you might consider discussing that. You may also consider using your personal feelings about gun ownership and if it should be restricted or not.Always keep in mind the research paper outline and start from there. Do not stray too far away from that outline, but do consider including some of the different points we have already talked about.

The Bomb That Saved Millions Essay Example For Students

The Bomb That Saved Millions Essay The Terror that Saved MillionsThe atomic bomb and its use over the two Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki is still a source of heated debate even over fifty years later. Many people on both sides -Japan and The United States- hold the belief that Trumans decision to drop the bomb was a mistake and that under no circumstances should such drastic measures be taken in war. What these people do not realize are the far more horrible alternatives than the destruction of just two cities: an invasion of mainland Japan where millions of more deaths would have occurred, Soviet aid resulting in the division of Japan into a communist nation and the destruction of their culture, the deaths of thousands of Allied prisoners of war held in Japan, and the threat of renewed hostilities from Japan not to mention the possibility of several more years of bloody conflict. Throughout the course of this paper all of these examples will be discussed, as well as why Trumans decision was the most humane and rational for all the nations involved, including Japan. We will write a custom essay on The Bomb That Saved Millions specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now Axis power in Europe was destroyed, Hitler and Mussolini were dead, their armies annihilated, their nations in ruins, Japan however was not. Though weakened from a near four year long war with the Allies, the Japanese continued fighting, as was their code, to fight to the death, and never surrender. President Harry Truman in the interest of saving both American and Japanese lives from an invasion of mainland Japan, authorized the use atomic bombs against Japan. The first atomic bomb to be used on Japan was composed of uranium. It was dropped on Hiroshima, Japan, on Aug. 6, 1945. The explosion, which had the force of more than 15,000 tons of TNT, instantly and completely devastated 10 square kilometers of the heart of this city of 343,000 inhabitants. Of this number, 66,000 were killed immediately and 69,000 were injured, more than 67 percent of the citys structures were destroyed or damaged. The next atomic bomb to be exploded was of the plutonium type, it was dropped on Nagasaki three days later, producing a blast equal to 21,000 tons of TNT. The terrain and smaller size of Nagasaki reduced destruction of life and property, but nevertheless 39,000 people were killed and 25,000 injured, while 40 percent of the citys structures were destroyed or seriously damaged. Preceding the bombing of Hiroshima the Americans had pledged that if the Japanese did not agree to an unconditional surrender and an immediate conclusion to all hostilities that th ey would bomb Japan with atomic weapons. The Japanese called the Americans on a bluff or simply dismissed the Americans words as tough talk and nothing more, unfortunately for the Japanese, the Americans did have the weapons they claimed they did, and werent afraid to use them. Hiroshima was destroyed, though a catastrophe for the Japanese, it still did not mean their surrender. The Japanese, urged by their military establishment to continue the pursuit of victory still did not respond to the American threat. It took the Japanese another lost city in Nagasaki three days later to commence peace negotiations. It was too late for over 100,000 people by the time the treaty was signed aboard the American Battleship U.S. Missouri on September.2nd 1945. Japan had in essence, been defeated months before the bomb was dropped, the problem no longer existed to defeat Japan, but to secure her surrender- a far more difficult task. Quite simply, the Japanese did not believe in surrender. Their na tion had never lost a war. In addition, Japans fighting men held ingrained beliefs that to surrender was to disgrace ones self and ones nation. So deeply were these thoughts held that even after both bombs had been detonated and the entry of the Soviet Union into the war, the Japanese military still opposed surrender bitterly, and would prefer death than dishonorable capitulation. With a foe with a mind set such as this, only two options could be considered by the United States government. One being the use of atomic weapons and the other being the invasion of mainland Japan. According to Trumans top military advisors, an invasion of mainland Japan would cost and an estimated 500,000 American lives, not to mention over a million Japanese deaths. Truman wrote years later, We estimated that if we should be forced to carry this invasion plan to its conclusion, the major fighting would not end until the latter part of 1946, at the earliest. I was informed that such operations might be expected to cost over a million casualties, in American forces alone. Such an operation would also require the use of European theater American troops departure from Europe to Japan, to an aid in the assault. With the largest invasion force ever assembled, comprising of approximately 2,000,000 troops. (Far larger than the Normandy invasion) According to Major General Masakazu Amanu, the chief of the Operations Section at Japanese Imperial Headquarters, We were absolutely sure of victory over an allied offensive. It was the first and the only battle in which the main strength of the air, land and sea forces were to be joined. The geographical advantages of the homeland were to be utilized to the highest degree, the enemy was to be crushed, and we were confident that the battle would prove to be the turning point in political maneuvering. To repel the invasion, Japan had almost two million troops under arms, while millions of civilians were being trained to kill invaders, with guns, explosive charges strapped to their bodies, and even bamboo spears. Thousands of planes and midget submarines were being produced by the Japanese for suicide missions. Fleet Admiral Nimitz once wrote in a memo to Admiral King regarding the possible invasion of Japan that, We must be prepared to accept heavy casualties whenever we invade Japan. Our previous successes against ill-fed and poorly supplied units, cut down by our overpowering naval and air action, should not be used as the sole basis of estimating the type of resistance we will meet in the Japanese homeland where the e nemy lines of communication will be short and the enemy supplies more adequate. In addition, to the Japanese strategic advantages, the Americans knew better than to underestimate the courage, skill, and tenacity of Japans military. Fighting in defense of their homeland, they would be truly formidable and show no mercy towards their foes. It would have been the bloodiest and most bitterly fought battle of any war in history. And even if the Americans should emerge victorious after an inevitably fierce and bloody campaign which would prolong the war an estimated year and a half, total casualties and sheer destructiveness would have far exceeded those of the two atomic bombs. The Japanese had developed a new fighting code for the invasion they expected from the Americans. They were instructed to deny aid to injured comrades, restrict retreat by making it punishable by death and converting all units including medical and logistical units into fighting units. It also called for injured s oldiers and patients to participate in the battle, without any attention to ones self. Propaganda was sent all over Japan preaching these rules and calling for every member of society to die for their native soil. One Senior Military Officer advocated involuntary sacrifices: Due to the nationwide food shortage and the imminent invasion of the home islands, it will be necessary to kill all the infirm old people, the very young, and the sick. We cannot allow Japan to perish because of them. According to the slogans that spread through Japan, every man, woman and child was expected to fight to the death. People were told to sing a song entitled The Honorable Death of A Hundred Million. It was even proposed that with the invasion, the invaders may use Japanese civilians as cover, the Japanese fighters were given strict instructions to kill the enemy, with hostages or not, and plow down their own if it meant enemy casualties. The Japanese had even began to mass produce manned torpedoes a nd submarines, including 6,000 kamikaze planes. Pilots as young as thirteen were being trained to kill themselves in the name of the emperor. How could the invasion of such a fanatical Japan, have been successful without the loss of countless lives?Upon the conclusion of the Second World War, much of the former enemies to the allies were divided into sections, one section controlled by the Soviets the other by the United States. Should the Soviets have been involved in the final defeat of Japan -which would have been necessary if the bombs hadnt been dropped- then the Soviets would have demanded a Soviet Zone in Japan, just as they did in Germany, Korea and several other Asian nations. With the Soviets in control of a good portion of Japan, Japanese culture would have been compromised indefinitely. It would have surely delayed Japans recovery, with the Soviets policy of massive reparations, and the possibility of a resurgent Japan may have arisen. Without the United States extensive aid after the War, future may have repeated herself as she did with Germany after the first world war. The atomic bombs allowed the Americans to end the war by themselves, without any Soviet intervention, and because of that Japanese culture as well as the security of Japans former foes was protected. .u3604a8353a6fea6fa9eab72477538e31 , .u3604a8353a6fea6fa9eab72477538e31 .postImageUrl , .u3604a8353a6fea6fa9eab72477538e31 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u3604a8353a6fea6fa9eab72477538e31 , .u3604a8353a6fea6fa9eab72477538e31:hover , .u3604a8353a6fea6fa9eab72477538e31:visited , .u3604a8353a6fea6fa9eab72477538e31:active { border:0!important; } .u3604a8353a6fea6fa9eab72477538e31 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u3604a8353a6fea6fa9eab72477538e31 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u3604a8353a6fea6fa9eab72477538e31:active , .u3604a8353a6fea6fa9eab72477538e31:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u3604a8353a6fea6fa9eab72477538e31 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u3604a8353a6fea6fa9eab72477538e31 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u3604a8353a6fea6fa9eab72477538e31 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u3604a8353a6fea6fa9eab72477538e31 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u3604a8353a6fea6fa9eab72477538e31:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u3604a8353a6fea6fa9eab72477538e31 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u3604a8353a6fea6fa9eab72477538e31 .u3604a8353a6fea6fa9eab72477538e31-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u3604a8353a6fea6fa9eab72477538e31:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Third time is a Charm EssayThere are those in Japan that felt no resentment towards the United States for their usage of the atomic bomb on Japan. A fighting mans view of the atomic bomb came from Captain Mitsuo Fuchida, who had led the air attack on Pearl Harbor and who had been one of those investigating Hiroshima the day after the disaster. In his opinion, once a nation embarked upon war, it was obligated to go all out. To possess a weapon that could ensure victory and not use it would be to break faith with a nations people as well as to disgrace the memory of lost comrades and make their sacrifices meaningless. What must be remembered is that during the Second World W ar, both Nazi Germany and expansionist Japan tried to perfect the atomic weapon, it would be absolutely ludicrous to suggest that Japan and Germany wouldnt have used it if they got it first. Americans were still dying, a solution arose that would end the loss of all American lives and end the war quickly. They seized it. Captain Fuchida also added that given the culture of his nation, Japan would inevitably have used the atomic bomb over the United States if it meant their assured surrender. At the time the bomb was dropped, hope was expressed that the bombs very horror might frighten mankind into recognizing that war was no longer a viable alternative. In his postwar surrender address General MacArthur warned, Even the lesson of victory itself brings with it profound concern, both for our future security, and the survival of civilization . . . The utter destructiveness of war now blots out this alternative. We have had our last chance. MacArthurs hopes that after such a war, with a climax as harsh as the destruction of a city full of women and children, that nations will come to realize that war is no longer a sane option. The use of the bomb made this idea realistic, when people could see what this technological terror was really capable of creating. No longer did its use or creation seem as appealing, it became more of a referee in a sports match, controlling sides and making sure the rules are followed. American Civil War General Robert E. Lee once said It is well that war is so terrible, or we should get too fond of it. The use of the atomic bomb opened the worlds eyes to its horror. Its initial use over fifty years ago prevented what could have been a nuclear war against the Soviets years later. Both the Soviets and Americans had seen its awesome power, both were far too scared to use it. And for one of the first times in hundreds of years, weve had fifty or so years without any major conflicts or World Wars. During one night of American B-29 raids over Tokyo 100,000 Japanese lives were lost. 41,000 more lives were lost in Tokyo that night than they were in Hiroshima, but we simply dismiss these as casualties of war, expected numbers from an expected air assault. The city of Tokyo was devastated, estimates of the damage rank near the damage caused in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Lives are lives, no matter how you look at it, people that are dead from atomic weapons or air assaults, or an invasion of mainland Japan, are just as dead. Though the radioactive nature of the atomic bombs does cause some long term difficulties, what with increased cases of cancer and birth defects, the number of lives lost still remains far less. More lives, regardless of how they were to be taken would be lost if the bombs were not dropped. Its not as though Hiroshima and Nagasaki were random targets either, they were not selected for the sole purpose of killing civilians, both were active working parts of the Japan ese war effort, one an army center, the other naval and industrial. When people argue that the use of the atomic bomb on Japan is ranked up with humanities greatest crimes of the century such as the Holocaust, they dont realize that the number of lives lost is far less then countless other acts of war which were committed on both sides. Hundreds of thousands of more lives maybe even millions would have been lost if the B-29 raids would have continued, as they could claim 100,000 people in one night, they would have inevitably preceded a land invasion with thousands of lives lost through bombing everyday. .ud1e4261ce635805aece6d4c012fd3aba , .ud1e4261ce635805aece6d4c012fd3aba .postImageUrl , .ud1e4261ce635805aece6d4c012fd3aba .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ud1e4261ce635805aece6d4c012fd3aba , .ud1e4261ce635805aece6d4c012fd3aba:hover , .ud1e4261ce635805aece6d4c012fd3aba:visited , .ud1e4261ce635805aece6d4c012fd3aba:active { border:0!important; } .ud1e4261ce635805aece6d4c012fd3aba .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ud1e4261ce635805aece6d4c012fd3aba { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ud1e4261ce635805aece6d4c012fd3aba:active , .ud1e4261ce635805aece6d4c012fd3aba:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ud1e4261ce635805aece6d4c012fd3aba .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ud1e4261ce635805aece6d4c012fd3aba .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ud1e4261ce635805aece6d4c012fd3aba .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ud1e4261ce635805aece6d4c012fd3aba .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ud1e4261ce635805aece6d4c012fd3aba:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ud1e4261ce635805aece6d4c012fd3aba .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ud1e4261ce635805aece6d4c012fd3aba .ud1e4261ce635805aece6d4c012fd3aba-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ud1e4261ce635805aece6d4c012fd3aba:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Personal Narrative Essay Example High SchoolThe atomic bomb is far more powerful as an idea rather than as a weapon. atomic weapons have the power to kill tens of thousands of people within a few seconds, they have the power to wipe out all signs of buildings or life and most important of all they have the power to stop a war where millions have died. The atomic bomb was not dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki to kill the most people it possibly could, it was dropped for the reason to stop the war. If American intentions were to kill the most people they could have bombed Tokyo and killed thousands upon thousands more. The terrain of both cities was that the bombs full poten tial would not be used. The atomic bomb is a fear weapon, its main purpose is the threat of its use, not its actual use. After the two bombs had been dropped, the Japanese finally realized that courage, skill and fearless combat cannot help against weapons with power such as this. It opened their eyes and helped them realize that living with surrender is better than dying in vain. Another factor comes into play when justifying Trumans decision, 100,000 allied prisoners of war on Japanese soil at the time of the bombing. And a promise by the Japanese that each and everyone of them would be killed using, mass bombing, or poisons, drowning, decapitation, or whatever the situation dictates, this according to a Japanese directive received by the heads of the P.O.W. camps when the prospect of an invasion arose. The directive continued to state that, In any case it is the aim not to allow the escape of a single one, prisoner to annihilate them all, and not leave any traces. Those 100,000 allied prisoners of war were saved when Hiroshima and Nagasaki were bombed. An American prisoner named Lester I. Tenney later wrote, As a prisoner in Japan, I saw the mushroom cloud over Nagasaki. The atomic bomb surely saved my life and the lives of hundreds of my buddies, and it ended a long, terrible war. These lives were up in the air, at any moment before the war was over, these soldiers lives were in Jeopardy, a slogan meant for convincing skeptics of the use of atomic weapons said simply, Whose son will die in the last minute of the war? Minutes count! It was the Americans duty to save American lives, though a tragedy for the enemy, they were warned. In times of war your defending the lives of your own citizens, if youve got the power to defend them, then you do so with whatever means in your power. One of the most controversial issues of our century; Should Truman have authorized the dropping of the atomic bomb? When one looks into the alternatives to such an act, the picture that is painted is one far more grisly than the deaths that occurred at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Millions of more lives hung in the air, Truman had the power to reach out to these millions of lives, however in order to do so he had to destroy a fraction of them in the process. The Japanese speak of how they were fighting for the preservation of their culture. How could the systemati c invasion and destruction of Japan preserve their culture? The United States had to open up their eyes, the Japanese did not get the message until atomic weapons were used. They may have realized this after an invasion, or they may not have, it was far too big of risk to take, and far too many lives would be lost. We take no pleasure in remembering those approximately 100,000 people that died in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The death of so many is without a doubt a horror, however how many more lives would have been lost if the bomb had not have been used?The evidence is crystal clear. The use of nuclear weapons to end World War II quickly and effectively averted the death or injury of hundreds of thousands of American soldiers, sailors, marines and airmen. It also saved the lives of some 100,000 Allied prisoners of war and civilians in Japanese hands, all of whom were to be executed in the event of an American invasion of Japan. Above all, it saved untold hundreds of thousands more Jap anese -perhaps millions- from becoming casualties of pre-invasion B-29 bombing and shelling, followed by an invasion and Allied occupation. It prevented the annihilation of Japanese culture and their possible assimilation into the Soviet Unions communist sphere of influence and it told the world the horrors of war. The atomic bombs use on Hiroshima and Nagasaki saved lives and ended a World War that had raged for many long terrible years and was responsible for the deaths of over 35,000,000 people.

Anne Marie has to Give Her Best Essay - And So Will You!

Anne Marie has to Give Her Best Essay - And So Will You!Anne Marie Millarville is the mystery writer behind the latest internet article contest which allows the contestants to submit their articles for a chance to win a grand prize of $1.7 million dollars. She is hosting this event to challenge those who are confident enough to enter the contest to go the extra mile and ensure that they have the best essay and the best writing skills. Anne Marie is offering her opinion as a writer and is taking into consideration all the feedback she has received from the other contestants and would also be interested to hear what the judges have to say as well.The Millarville article-writing contest is set to end on September the 12th at midnight. You will have to visit her website on the internet to access the link to register. You will have to provide your full name, email address, phone number, name of your contact person, country you live in, and the date on which you would like to begin the ess ay contest. The deadline for submission is December 15th.Anne Marie is a writer who offers such kind of services to her clients. She has already won many of her contests and has brought pleasure to many people through her unique and original content. These articles can be used by any business or institution for their marketing activities. A good writer would be very much appreciated as they are indeed an asset to a company or institution.Anne Marie believes that she has a hard task ahead of her, but she would definitely not give up. She will spend plenty of time and effort trying to improve her skills so that she will reach the top of the competition. She will never let this competition get to her; she would rather take the challenge head on and compete against the rest of the contestants and be the first one to win a grand prize of a million dollars.The Millarville article-writing contest is not a competition to win the most number of articles. It is an opportunity for every aspiri ng writer to reach the front page of the Google search engine. This is the ultimate goal of every writer.Anne Marie has also started up a Twitter account so that she can keep in touch with all the contestants and also talk about all the things she is doing. She has offered to spend some time on her personal blog to read all the comments on her blog, so you can see her reaction to the success of the contest.The Millarville article-writing contest will definitely help Anne Marie to improve her skills and also make her a better writer. She will be coming out with more articles which will not only make her a better writer but also increase her popularity among the online audience.