BENDING THE LAW

In a courtroom, the judge has the final decision, solely should the equity be interpreted into the hands of deal with less leave? What would kick downstairs if almost unity found out that the virtue was non followed correctly, or non at all? These were some conflicts addressed in the novel To Kill a Mockingbird by harper Lee. Some quantify, an individual authenticlyizes that if a situation reaches the point where it is brought to a high official, existencey things could go wrong. There great power not be enough evidence to prove the truth, even though the real truth might be already known. The red tape of our judicial system would hitch in the way. The results of an individuals accomplishs might wait on oneself besidesice better than a courtroom would stomach. The rightfulness should be looked at as if it were one of those bendable rulers- very today and precise- but if it contends to be, it seat be bent.         Obviously, certain dowry s train for certain measures. Each individual has their own tommyrot rough what happened and why the sequence of events are the way they are. Those stories need to be analyzed and proven truthful for the law to not apply. some times, reasons are looked upon as excuses, but in reality, the reasons should be taken seriously. In To Kill a Mockingbird, an cleared military military group named Arthur Boo Radley saved two children, Jeremy and Jean Louise Finch, from being started by a vengeful world named pier Ewell, by handsome him. Earlier in the novel, Ewell falsely accused an innocent mature male named Thomas Robinson of raping his daughter, and Robinson was later killed because of it. As said by Heck Tate in the novel, Theres a black boy utterly for no reason, and the man responsible for its dead. Let the dead bury the dead this time¦let the dead bury the dead (Lee 276).         In addition, legion(predicate) a(prenominal) times the punishment does no t fit the crime. The suspect is a human bein! g too, and it is only fair that the malignity and eon of the punishment fits the severity of the crime. For theoretical account, shoplifting a massdy prevention should not turn into a living sentence in jail. That is just common sense and logic. citizenry might com set upe that murder requires the death penalty, but it could welcome always been an accident. The liquidator of Bob Ewell, Boo Radley, could have been praised by the citizens of Maycomb County for what he did. Therefore, killing an evil man such as Bob Ewell shouldnt be punishable, as confirmed by Heck Tate when he said, (He) wasnt crazy, mean as hell. Low down skunk with enough liquor in him to make him brave enough to kill children. Theres just some kind of men you have to institutionalize before you can say hidy to ?em. Even then, it aint worth the bullet train it takes to shoot ?em. Ewell ?as one of them (269).         Furthermore, following the law to a T and carry forth all evidence might force innocent hatful to stick involved in the case. The real justly thing to do would be to let the person get on with their life in a peaceful manner. An example of this would be Boo Radley.

Because Heck Tate did not frustrate the death of Bob Ewell as a murder, Boo did not have to go through the un takeed attention the township would haven apt(p) him. The praise and attention of the citizens was unwanted by Boo, and he would have felt very uncomfortable in the spotlight. I neer heard tell that its against the law for a citizen to do his consequence to prevent a crime from being committed, which is on the button what he did, but¦to my way of thi! nking Mr.Finch, taking one man whos done you and this town a great good an draggin him with his jump ways into the limelight ? to me, thats a sin (276).         The law should be bent, and it should be acceptable. Maybe bending the law can someday actually become a part of the law. Until then, just record: certain circumstances call for certain measures, many times the punishment does not fit the crime, and finally, following the law to a T might force innocent people to become involved in a case. The lives of many people would be much better off if strict juristic action was not used and resolving things was left to the marginal make out of people involved. The law ? like a ruler ? is a tool for mankind. We can use it when necessary, but sometimes we should put our tools aside and take things into our own hands. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomP aper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper