Annotated Bibliography Essay Example for Free

Annotated Bibliography riseIn this report, Hanna Rosin argues that increasing taxes on junk foods may encourage people to purchase levelheaded fruits and vegetables instead of high-fat, sugary snacks. According to Rosin, researchers have conducted experiments that tested whether people would choose low-priced well-grounded foods everyplace regular-priced junk foods in vending machines and in high schools. In each experiment, she contends, sales of low-calorie snacks, fruits, and vegetables increased, and sales of frothing foods decreased.These experiments, in the authors opinion, suggest that increasing the cost of junk foods may promote healthy food choices. Schlosser, Eric. warm Food Nation The Dark Side of the All-American Meal. New York Houghton Mifflin, 2001. According to Eric Schlosser, author of Fast Food Nation (2001), the quick-food industry took root alongside that interstate highway system, as a brisk form of restaurant sprang up beside the off-ramps. Fast fo od operators established restaurants in strategic places, targeting busy intersections and commercialised hubs.Schlosser said that McDonalds, the largest fast-food chain in the world, is in fact one of the worlds largest geters of satellite photography, utilise it to predict the direction of suburban sprawl. With the app atomic number 18nt ubiquitousness and the intense advertising schemes, Schlosser and other critics have feared that fast food does not only capitalize to attract us in spending our hard-earned money to buy their products, but they also act irresponsibly in failing to adequately inform consumers of the health risks twisty in eating fast food. Fox, M. K. , Hamilton, W. and Lin, B. H.(2004).Effects of Food Assistance and fodder Programs on Health and Nutrition vol. 3, Literature Review, Food Assistance and Nutrition Research Report no. 19-3. Washington U. S. Department of Agriculture, scotch Research Service. In this report, Fox et al. (2004) revealed that the U. S. Congress has recently in all toldowed after-school programs in seven statesDelaware, Illinois, Michigan, Missouri, New York, Oregon, and Pennsylvaniato aid suppers as well as snacks to children in areas where more than 50 percent of the children qualify for free or reduced-price school meals.With this program, some low-income children may eat three meals and a snack every weekday during the school category from federal food programsa fact that highlights both the growing importance of the federal child nutrition programs for children in low-income families and the need to ensure that the foods these programs serve are consistent with the recommendations in the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Graham, Rob and Kingsley, Sarah Williams. New instruction Finds That Food is the Top Product Seen Advertised by Children Among All Children, Tweens See the Most Food Ads at More than 20 a Day. Kaiser Family Foundation.28 Mar 2007. 06 Nov 2007. http//www. kff. org/entmedia/entmedia032 807nr. cfm. This news report revealed that childhood obesity is relate to food advertising target children. Policymakers in Congress, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and agencies such as the nominate of Medicine (IOM) have clamored to have necessary changes in the advertising unhealthy foods. In the report authorise Food for Thought Television Food Advertising to Children in the United States, the Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF) found that tweens ages 8-12 project the most food ads on TV, an average of 21 ads a day, or more than 7,600 a year.Teenagers suffer slightly fewer ads, at 17 a day, for a total of more than 6,000 a year. Of all food ads in the study that target children or teens, 34% are for candy and snacks, 28% are for cereal, and 10% are for fast foods. Four percent are for dairy products and 1% for fruit juices. Alarmingly, of all the 8,854 ads reviewed in their study, there were none for fruits or vegetables targeting children or teens. Schlafly, Phyllis. Fat Ki ds Whos Responsible? Eagleforum, 17 kin 2003. 06 Nov 2007.http//www. eagleforum.org/column/2003/sept03/03-09-17. shtml. This position by Phyllis Schlafly declared that public schools must take a big ploughshare of responsibility for the current epidemic of childhood obesity. Schlafly maintained that rather than contributing to childhood obesity by providing easy access to junk foods and sodas, schools must take action to reduce it. In her opinion, schools uphold a powerful influence over what children eat and the amount of time they spend exercising, and could thus be a powerful force in fighting obesity.