Periodic Table of Visualization Methods Essay

From 1899, the new-fangled hook has always handle three types of adolescent cases. These cases implicate child neglect, evil and another(prenominal) side offences. late delinquency cases atomic number 18 un practice of lawful action that is per formed by the minors which would therein be crimes if they were partaken by adults. military position offences be on the other hand noncriminal offences which are deemed offences if they are committed by the minors. The unwashed examples of these status offences include running away and truancy. Till 1960s, both noncriminal and criminal behaviors were all considered to be forms of tumble-downs. Hence the law did not differentiate between delinquents and status offenders. In neglect and child abuse cases, the move give always provide protection for children who are abuse or neglected. In the year 1994, delinquency cases make up to 64% of the total juvenile cases in these courts, with status offences making 15% and neglect a nd abuse cases making 16% of the total national juvenile court cases. I gift discussed all these types of these cases downstairs with the description of these court processes that are involved in the discussion of these cases along with the current policy issues which are involved. It is worth noting that though these cases seem to be different from each other, there are virtually common themes and values which are applied in handling these cases. The most obvious of these is the judges which are handling these cases to note that these children collect to be taken care of for their development in making legal decisions making much attention to the legal needs of children along with their families. Secondly, even if the court is one of the institutions that work to the betterment of the families and children, it is posed with a unique and awesome power in delinquency, child abuse cases and the status offences cases. juvenile person court has powers to separate the childre n from their parents, goat overly order these minors to live in confined places, also they can end the biological right of relationship between a child and the parent and develop for them other new parental rights. As these decisions are deemed to be real right and fundamental to the headspring being of children, ensuring these courts possesses adequate resources is very vital as it handles every type of cases. Judges require information, executable facilities and adequate training so that it can be able to handle these cases in the most fascinate dash. Adequate representation of all the involved parties should always be in the court proceedings. All the communities need to have safe, effective program and placements which are purchasable for children coming before the court. As it would be very clear from the subsequent discussion, these courts handle very difficult workloads and involves the most emotion laden and very contentious issues in most parts of the societ y. Because of this, these decisions have in many cases faced disagreements. The extent to which these cases should be furnished and expanded to equip them with the resources that are required for them to adequately perform their roles has formed basis of many discussions and debates. Lastly, as these courts make decisions which are very vital in the societal development, they are most often the down of the social media and in most cases form the basis for political platform. So judges should always have the urge to play leadership roles, both in the agencies which serve children and the broader community so as to assist thoughtful and deliberative approaches to all these problems, instead of other approaches which are reached hastily.Delinquency The juvenile handling of the delinquent case is the one which is always handled by these courts in the general unexclusive perception. When unlawful deeds are committed by the minors, these cases are usually brought under these courts as delinquent cases. These cases in most cases include petty stealth, misdemeanors, vandalism and also some kind of felonies like robbery and other aggravated assaults. The level better age handled by these courts are typically determined by the defer laws. In the District of capital of South Carolina and other 37 states, the maximum age for this is 17 years of age, in other 10 states it is 16 and in the rest 3 this is go under to a maximum of 15 years. Currently these courts have pose the centre stage for popular concern due to the increasing number of crimes and the high rate of juvenile related crimes. Recently these courts have been criticized for their perceived leniency towards their decision on these juvenile delinquents. One of the best examples of this is the inability of these courts failure to impose sentences that go beyond 21 years of age. High visibility and overserious violent crimes that are committed by minors have always captured the public rel ates and attention sketch juvenile offenders treatment to get tougher on crimes that have been popular politically for the past twenty years. This public fear of the juvenile court jurisdiction has resulted into some changes in the jurisdiction of the juvenile courts. Since 1992, the executive and the legislative branch in 41 states has hence limited the jurisdiction of the cases that involve chronic offenders, violent and shifted these court cases from their rehabilitative tradition which have involved addressing offenders rather than the offences which has been committed toward a more punitive agreement which is focused on the offence itself. For instance, 14 states in the year 1990 had to amend their codes to clearly list public safety as the sole purpose of the juvenile justice system the punishment is listed as all primary or one of the several purposes of the court system in 28 states. The most operative thing that has happened since 1992 is that all but 10 states have structured adult courts in a manner that they can be able to handle juvenile cases. In most of the instances when the minors are convicted in the adult courts, it really posses a possibility that the minor may be sentenced to the prisons instead of being primed(p) in juvenile facilities that offers rehabilitative programs. Even though the violent juvenile cases grab most of the interest and headlines from the media and tend to have the highest influence on the justice system, most of the juvenile courts handle less serious crimes. Mostly, the highest numbers of cases that are handled by most of the juvenile courts involve cases like vandalism, motor vehicle theft in which they mostly belong to their parents and larceny cases. In 1992, police made a lot of juvenile arrests and contrary to the perception of the public the most serious name was a property offence charge in the 57% of the total cases. Offences against persons like assault and robberies comprised of 215 of the tot al cases, disorder conduct which is a form of public order offence showed to be like 17% of the cases with the 155 being taken by the drug law violation. In spite of the young people being not disproportionately accountable for the most violent crimes, they always commit more than their share of property criminal offences. For instance in the year 1992, the youth aged between 10 to 17 years of age comprised 13 % of the US population and they were responsible for like the same percentage of their population of all the violent crimes which were committed in this year and they were responsible for more than 23% of the property crimes which is more than their proportion portion of their population.Purpose of the look for Currently it has been more than 100th anniversary of these juvenile court approaches. This paper pull up stakes provide an perceptivity for the explanation of the cases that are handled by these courts along with the current trends and issues that have cro pped up in these juvenile courts. The master(prenominal) goal of this research paper is to present an apparent description of these courts today and hence address the emerging challenges along with the recommendations to be adopted. This paper majorly addresses the courts status and their ability to handle these cases along with the improvements that should be adopted for these courts to be able to partake their roles in the most usurp manner.The research methodologyIn my data collection, I will employ both primary and secondary data methods of data collection. ancient methods Census- I will carry out census where I will talk to the many stakeholders and other involved associations and institutions although this method is somehow expensive because of the cost involved.Samples- I will ingest out some of the involved people and stakeholdersObservation- I will visit some of the juvenile courts to get the real state on the ground.The secondary sources of data collection Que stionnaires- I will develop many questionnaires which I will use to get the information required to carry out my research. Surveys- through the questionnaires, I will sample out and send some surveys to the stakeholders and these specialized institutions. Books, web, magazines, journals and other online sources- I will use the already available written materials to get complete insights on this topic.In my data abbreviation, I will include the adjacent methods of data analysisContent analyzes This is the most simple and widely employed method of data analysis. It can be defined as the systematic description of behavior which asks, who? Where and how? And what questions within a formulated nail down of rules so as to limit the effects of bias in analysis. It could be the most preferred proficiency which is employed to analyze semi-structured interviews and cognitive interview testing. Narrative analysis- I will employ narrative analysis to analyze data where I will focus on the peoples stories and how they think virtually the issue in question. Although I will not treat these stories as the true facts I exceedingly employ them to get how people think and feel about these juvenile courts.3. Grounded Theory This is the most step and classical technique that is employed in analyzing social data. It uses hierarchical and systematic data set. It develops a set of inductively derived hypothesis that is grounded on the data.Triangulation In this method of data analysis I will combine both the quantitative and qualitative data analysis to come up with a precise data interpretation. data presentationIn my data presentation, I will employ many methods which would be very appropriate for this data.Frequency distribution table In this method I shall be focusing on the point of a definite variable like a certain facility in the juvenile courts jibe to each state court system.Graphical methodsHere I will try to focus on the relation ship of variables in the court system.ChartsThese will be used to show the extent to which a certain variable has been employed in the courts.ReferencesJulian Mack, The Chancery Procedure in the Juvenile appeal, in The Child, The Clinic, and the Court (1925), p. 310.Julian Mack, The Juvenile Court, 23 Harv.L.Rev. 104, 119-120 (1909).Shears, Legal Problems Peculiar to Childrens Courts, 48 A.B.A.J. 719, 720 (1962)January 2007 publication, Californias vicious Justice system.Vitaly Friedman (2008) Data Visualization and Infographics in Graphics, Monday Inspiration, January 14th, 2008.Lengler, Ralph Lengler, Ralph. Periodic Table of Visualization MethodsSource document